🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.